Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: "Case studies in bioinformatics 2017""
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Modules | * Modules | ||
** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ||
| − | ** | + | ** Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study ([https://drive.switch.ch/index.php/s/aCCfsfd8NyjFipc materials and description]) |
** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ||
** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ||
Revision as of 18:19, 12 November 2017
- Coordinator: Sven Bergmann
- Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics
- Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2017
- Modules
- Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?
- Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study (materials and description)
- Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?
- Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?
- Teachers
- Course grades are based on reports (for one assigned module):
- 1 point for handing in a report
- up to 1 point for the Introduction
- up to 3 point for the Results section
- up to 1 point for the Discussion
