Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: "Case studies in bioinformatics 2017""
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ||
** [[Module 2: How to normalize metabolomics data: z-scores or creatinine as reference?]] | ** [[Module 2: How to normalize metabolomics data: z-scores or creatinine as reference?]] | ||
| − | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3 | + | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3 How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] |
** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ||
* Teachers | * Teachers | ||
Revision as of 14:14, 5 September 2017
- Coordinator: Sven Bergmann
- Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics
- Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2017
- Modules
- Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?
- Module 2: How to normalize metabolomics data: z-scores or creatinine as reference?
- Module 3 How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?
- Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?
- Teachers
- Students
