Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: Case studies in bioinformatics 2020"

 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
* Coordinator: [[Sven Bergmann]]
 
* Coordinator: [[Sven Bergmann]]
 
* [[Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics]]
 
* [[Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics]]
* [[Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2029]]
+
* [[Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2020]]
 
* Modules
 
* Modules
 
** [[Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study|Module 1: Programming project]]  
 
** [[Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study|Module 1: Programming project]]  
 
** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?|Module 2: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]]
 
** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?|Module 2: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]]
 
** Module 2: [[Gene Expression Signatures 101 - The PAM50 gene expression signature]]
 
** Module 2: [[Gene Expression Signatures 101 - The PAM50 gene expression signature]]
** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]]
+
** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 4: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]]
  
 
* Teachers
 
* Teachers
 
** [[User:Sven|Sven Bergmann]]
 
** [[User:Sven|Sven Bergmann]]
** [[User:NicolasSalamin|Niclas Salamin]]
+
** [[User:NicolasSalamin|Nicolas Salamin]]
 
** [[User:DavidGfeller|David Gfeller]]
 
** [[User:DavidGfeller|David Gfeller]]
 
** [[User: GiovanniCiriello|Giovanni Ciriello]]
 
** [[User: GiovanniCiriello|Giovanni Ciriello]]

Latest revision as of 16:33, 5 November 2020

  • Course grades are based on reports (for one randomly assigned module):
    • 1 point for handing in a report
    • up to 1 point for the Introduction (one page)
    • up to 3 points for the Results section (3 pages)
    • up to 1 point for the Discussion (one page)
    • points are given based on:
      • completeness: is each section covered sufficiently?
      • correctness: is what you write correct?
      • comprehension: does your text show you really understood the module?