Evolution of polymorphism in plants

Revision as of 17:16, 5 June 2012 by Anonymous (talk)

Evolution of polymorphism in plants


Background:

Understanding modes of species evolution is the major questions to the current evolutionary biology. As more DNA data become available, an increasing number of researchers is now switching to phylogeny-based stochastic models. Therefore, the key challenge today is to develop and test algorithms which can adequately describe evolution of phenotypes.

Goal:

The goal of this project is to develop MCMC optimization of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with group-specific variance and then use it in phylogenetic comparative analysis to test for signal of directional/divergent selection in a group of plants

Mathematical tools:

Statistics (stochastic models and MCMC) and programming. The students will learn how to use R to implement stochastic models and develop optimization procedures of the model parameters

Biological or Medical aspects:

This kind of analysis allow to estimate the most probable way of evolution, and permit to answer a lot of question like phenotypic evolution, comparative analysis between species and more other.

Supervisors:

Anna Kostikova & Nicolas Salamin

Students:

Rémy Morier-Genoud

Presentation on Brownian Motion:

Media:Slides_BrownianMotion.pptx

Implementation of Brownian Motion in Python: Code & Input examples:

Media:Polymorphism.zip, Media:dated_tree.zip, Media:frogs_bio10.zip

Report: Project Summary & Code explanations

Media:Report_BrownianMotion.pdf‎ Media:Report_Hoffman.pdf‎

References:

A Butler, A A King 2004 "Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution" American Naturalist: 164(6): 683-695

Back to UNIL BSc course: "Solving Biological Problems that require Math 2012"

Separate work on the estimation of the parameters to implement the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck mode

in this work, the goal was to implement the optimization algoritm described in the appendix of Butler and King's just cited paper.

This work was done with the same Supervisors and background as the work on brownian motion just described.

Students:

Georg Hoffmann

notes on the model:

The model for which i tried to find the parameters, is the simplest form of the Ornstein Uhlenbeck model: the model where at all points

of they evolution, the ancesters had all the same selective optimum. In Butler and King's paper, many different models are tried: Brownian motion and OU with up to X optimums. In theyr experiment the model with one selective optimum had the worst results in term of X from all. Actually, in a first implementation it was possible to choose multiple optimums, but as the code did not give the expected results, it was rewriten without this option to make it simpler and try to find the error.



Explanation of the implementation

This code failed to give results in accordance with the R packtages Geiger an Ouch, which also showed different results between themselves.

It may be that the data does not allow to get the right results, as only a small number of trees, mostly variations on one tree have been tested. There are some discussions one can read on the internet about those packtages giving different results, so it does not seem to be something new.


L'arbre phylogénique avec dendropy:


dendropy représente l'arbre avec une série d'embranchements (nodes) qui correspondent à la racine,

aux espèces actuelles et aux embranchements internes. Chaque node a un age, un nom (label) et un node parent (sauf la raçine). Dendropy permet de parcourir les nodes dans différents ordres .