Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: Case studies in bioinformatics 2018"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | * Coordinator: [[Sven Bergmann]] | |
+ | * [[Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics]] | ||
+ | * [[Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2018]] | ||
+ | * Modules | ||
+ | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ||
+ | ** [[Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study|Module 2: How to link genotypes to metabolites?]] | ||
+ | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ||
+ | ** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ||
+ | * Teachers | ||
+ | ** [[User:Sven|Sven Bergmann]] | ||
+ | ** [[User:DavidGfeller|David Gfeller]] | ||
+ | ** [[User: GiovanniCiriello|Giovanni Ciriello]] | ||
+ | * Course grades are based on reports (for one assigned module): | ||
+ | ** 1 point for handing in a report | ||
+ | ** up to 1 point for the Introduction (one page) | ||
+ | ** up to 3 points for the Results section (3 pages) | ||
+ | ** up to 1 point for the Discussion (one page) | ||
+ | ** points are given based on: | ||
+ | ***completeness: is each section covered sufficiently? | ||
+ | ***correctness: is what you write correct? | ||
+ | ***comprehension: does your text show you really understood the module? | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[How to upload files and edit your project page]] |
Revision as of 15:18, 13 July 2018
- Coordinator: Sven Bergmann
- Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics
- Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2018
- Modules
- Teachers
- Course grades are based on reports (for one assigned module):
- 1 point for handing in a report
- up to 1 point for the Introduction (one page)
- up to 3 points for the Results section (3 pages)
- up to 1 point for the Discussion (one page)
- points are given based on:
- completeness: is each section covered sufficiently?
- correctness: is what you write correct?
- comprehension: does your text show you really understood the module?