Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: "Case studies in bioinformatics 2017""
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Modules | * Modules | ||
** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | ||
− | ** [Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study | + | ** [[Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study|Module 2: How to link genotypes to metabolites?]] |
** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 3: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ||
** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ** [[Module 4: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] |
Revision as of 15:23, 15 November 2017
- Coordinator: Sven Bergmann
- Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics
- Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2017
- Modules
- Teachers
- Course grades are based on reports (for one assigned module):
- 1 point for handing in a report
- up to 1 point for the Introduction
- up to 3 point for the Results section
- up to 1 point for the Discussion