Difference between revisions of "UNIL MSc course: Case studies in bioinformatics 2018"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
* [[Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2018]] | * [[Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2018]] | ||
* Modules | * Modules | ||
| − | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data? | + | ** [[Module 2: Metabolome-wide genome-wide association study|Module 1: How to link genotypes to metabolites?]] |
| − | + | ** [[Module 1: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?|Module 2: Is the hourglass model for gene expression really supported by the data?]] | |
** [[Module 3: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ** [[Module 3: How do "our expectations" confound the results of our analyses?]] | ||
** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 4: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ** [[How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?|Module 4: How well does sequence similarity predict similarity in binding specificity?]] | ||
Revision as of 17:31, 31 October 2018
- Coordinator: Sven Bergmann
- Course idea and teaching goals of Case studies in Bioinformatics
- Schedule for Case studies in Bioinformatics 2018
- Modules
- Teachers
- Course grades are based on reports (for one randomly assigned module):
- 1 point for handing in a report
- up to 1 point for the Introduction (one page)
- up to 3 points for the Results section (3 pages)
- up to 1 point for the Discussion (one page)
- points are given based on:
- completeness: is each section covered sufficiently?
- correctness: is what you write correct?
- comprehension: does your text show you really understood the module?
